My blog is so bad a security firm is scared of me , how yellow skin are people in the UK!

Dear Becky,

Who caused the problem with Core assets ???? Also please provide details of what risk I pose more than two drunks that make up stories but you and Peter are happy for our boys to be left in the care of these child abusers , you are the criminals here and the threat not me young lady ! You and Peter should be ashamed of yourselves !

How stupid do you really think I am ?

Your email on 14 Feb said you will make arrangements so why are you not doing the job the Government is paying you for ?

Please advice ASAP

Kind regards

Phill Ferreira

Sent from my iPad

On 24 Feb 2014, at 09:39, rb@bsglaw.co.uk wrote:

Dear Mr Ferreira

I have been in contact with Core Assets who have confirmed they cannot accept the referral as their risk assessment has found the risk to be unacceptably high. I understand that the risk assessment was largely informed from the content of your online blog.

I have endeavoured to find an alternative service to provide information before the next hearing, but I will not be able to organise contact for Thursday – I have not yet identified a service willing to take your family on.

In any event, I had understood from your most recent email on the issue of contact the you were not prepared to finance supervised contact in any event, which is one of the conditions provided in the order.

If you chose not to attend the hearing on Friday, that is a matter for you, however no adjournment will be agreed on behalf of the children. As Mr Morey indicated in his position statement, any delay is harmful for the children, and these proceedings need to be brought to a conclusion as soon as possible.

I trust this clarifies matters for you. Please confirm if you intend to attend so I can notify the court accordingly.

Kind regards

Becky Butterfield

BSG Solicitors is the trading style of Blackhurst Swainson Goodier LLP which is a limited
liability partnership registered in England and Wales (Registered No. OC350314).
We use the word ‘partner’ to refer to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant who
is a lawyer with equivalent standing and qualifications.Partners: Mark Burrow, George Mercer BA,
Tom O’Neill LLB, James Goodier MA (Oxon), Keith Parr BA, Andie Brown LLB, Rebecca Lauder LLB.
Registered office 3&4 Aalborg Square, Lancaster, LA1 1BJ.
Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (no. 00524974).

——Original Message——

From: Phill Ferreira
To: Becky Work
To: Peter – Cafcass Morey
To: Ann Hurley
To: Family Lancaster County
Cc: McClure J
Subject: Contact 27 Feb with O and OFerreira
Sent: 24 Feb 2014 06:13

Dear Becky,

Hope you are well.

I am a little bit disappointed with you once again , as you state in the statement from Peter that you will arrange contact now that we have been turned down by Core Assets after the as normal interference of the surrogates spokesperson.

Please thus can you urgently confirm the new arrangements this morning as the surrogate said she would confirm by 24 Jan , today is now a month later with no contact from her in this regard.

If you do not confirm this morning I will have to re consider traveling to the UK just for the Court hearing and will then ask for the hearing to be re listed the week of 20 May as I will then be in the UK again to see the boys for their Birthday.

Please note that this also will be brought to the attention of the Judge is support of my committal application for the surrogate.

Kind Regards,

Phill Ferreira

Sent from my iPad
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

Maybe us one day little men … When the Courts wake up !

Judge Awards Custody of Teen to His Homeless Dad
Posted on February 28, 2011 by SBrinkmann
By Susan Brinkmann, OCDS
Staff Journalist

A Brooklyn judge has decided that a 17 year-old boy who has been in the custody of his well-paid mother all of his life, will now be better off living with his father – who is homeless and currently living in a city-run shelter.

The New York Post is reporting that Family Court Judge Bernard Graham has taken the teen away from his mother, Jeannette Traylor, a $90,000-a-year court worker, claiming his decision was based on the wishes of the child.

The boy claimed his mother was “self-absorbed” and uninterested in him, and that she once hit him with an umbrella.

As a result, custody of the boy was given to his father, John Jacobs, who has been living on the streets for years, according to court papers.

The couple broke up shortly after their son was born in 1994 and shared joint custody for a time until Traylor was awarded primary custody in 2001. Jacobs refused to accept that decision and spent the next decade trying to win back custody. In more than two dozen legal filings, Jacob “constantly misled” investigators and a psychologist once testified that he had “severe reservations” about his parenting skills, the papers claim.

“I begged the judge please not to play with my son’s life,” Traylor told The Post. “What my ex-husband does doesn’t surprise me. But I expected better when I went to court.”

Jacobs believes the judge made the right decision and is now living with his son in a city-run shelter in Brooklyn.

“If I was in a cardboard box and if it was better for my son, so be it,” he told the Post. “One parent is healthier for the child than the other . . . When you add the whole thing together, I’m better for the boy. That’s the bottom line.”

Traylor believes comments she made that were critical of the legal process affected the outcome of the case. Before rendering his final decision, the judge did indeed chastise her for being “quick to offer barbed criticism of the court and the legal process.”

The teen will continue to attend a nearby Catholic high school where his mother pays the tuition.

© All Rights Reserved, Living His Life Abundantly®/Women of Grace® http://www.womenofgrace.com

– See more at: http://www.womenofgrace.com/blog/?p=7231#sthash.idSQmYUA.XpjyZixU.dpuf

Daily update for my Boys 23 Feb 2014

20140223-135750.jpg

20140223-135756.jpg

20140223-135738.jpg

20140223-135744.jpg

Hello little men !

Hope you both are doing very well today ….lazy Sunday I guess for you both , felt a bit strange for me having to get up for work this morning as I have not done Sundays for the past 3 months….

I am really looking forward to your monthly update that I should get tomorrow as per the current Court order , maybe I might even get a current photo of you two…. You two need to also once you are able to send me a picture of you both with B&B , would love to see what breed they are and you having some fun with them both…

After your care givers spokes person went to talk rubbish to the Core Assets people re contact on 27 Feb I have not heard any news , all I know is your care giver said she would confirm a place for the contact on 24 Jan , that never happened , big surprise ! Also your solicitor said now that Core Assets class our family as to high risk after the visit of your care givers spokesperson she will find an alternative venue , that also have not happened so I guess I will have to come see you both at home then as the Court orders allowed me contact on the 27th , so can’t wait to see you both!

We had a comment from the lady called Babs again yesterday , if I did not know any better the poor English and foul langue I could swear that , that message came from your care giver or her spokesperson as that is they way they both speak to me all the time …nice people they are as I have said before…..

Ouma and Oupa sends all their love also , they say they hope that the will be able to see you both also one day soon or maybe even just say hello on the phone or Skype……

Just want to wish you both a great week , full of fun and lots of giggles , can’t wait to see you both on Thursday……

I will see you both a little later under our big old green tree in dream land, can’t wait for my dream cuddles and smiles…..

Night , night little men , happy new week dreams …..

Love you both more than mega big airports …..and miss you more ….

Love you little men…

Dad xx

40 Countries , 7030 hits and 123 comments ! Thank you !

Top Views by Country

Country Views
United Kingdom 4,582
South Africa 1,044
United Arab Emirates 554
Ireland 477
United States 133
Netherlands 35
India 21
Canada 16
Guernsey 14
New Zealand 13
Cyprus 13
Australia 11
Russian Federation 8
Oman 7
Poland 7
Singapore 7
Brazil 6
Germany 6
Italy 4
Greece 4
Turkey 3
Malaysia 3
Hong Kong 3
Philippines 2
Mexico 2
Finland 2
Namibia 2
Egypt 2
France 1
Austria 1
Senegal 1
Pakistan 1
Mozambique 1
Malta 1
Macao 1
Peru 1
Chile 1
Serbia 1
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1
Indonesia 1

What are parental responsibilities …..hope you read this Peter Morley , Becky Butterfield and Judge Singelton

Parental responsibilities
41 For the purposes of this Part, parental responsibilities with respect to a child are as follows:

(a) making day-to-day decisions affecting the child and having day-to-day care, control and supervision of the child;
(b) making decisions respecting where the child will reside;
(c) making decisions respecting with whom the child will live and associate;
(d) making decisions respecting the child’s education and participation in extracurricular activities, including the nature, extent and location;
(e) making decisions respecting the child’s cultural, linguistic, religious and spiritual upbringing and heritage, including, if the child is an aboriginal child, the child’s aboriginal identity;
(f) subject to section 17 of the Infants Act, giving, refusing or withdrawing consent to medical, dental and other health-related treatments for the child;
(g) applying for a passport, licence, permit, benefit, privilege or other thing for the child;
(h) giving, refusing or withdrawing consent for the child, if consent is required;
(i) receiving and responding to any notice that a parent or guardian is entitled or required by law to receive;
(j) requesting and receiving from third parties health, education or other information respecting the child;
(k) subject to any applicable provincial legislation,
(i) starting, defending, compromising or settling any proceeding relating to the child, and
(ii) identifying, advancing and protecting the child’s legal and financial interests;
(l) exercising any other responsibilities reasonably necessary to nurture the child’s development.